Since we are focusing on your responsibility as both an author and a reviewer, I would like you to reflect on your contribution in both areas.
As an author, how did you introduce your paper? Did you just let your peers read and respond? Did you give a brief synopsis of the scene? Why did you choose to do it this way?
As a reviewer, what did you contribute to your peers' essays? I want you to be very specific here ("I told Trevor that his introduction was too detail-focused and that he needed to get us into the action quicker."). Let me know about everything you contributed to your peers' work.
As a whole, was peer review effective? We've all had good and bad peer review sessions. What can I do as the professor to help peer review be more successful next time? What can you and your peers do to make peer review more successful next time?
No comments:
Post a Comment